what's webhard? Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream. Faster than the next cloud. About 20%. Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem). Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned). Webhard It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud. In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality. When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder. You must share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos. According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.*** It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point) It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services. You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly. Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you have to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again. The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level. Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive) Google Drive It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK. It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users. It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail. Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me. There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment. Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less. There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy. If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?) Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?) Dropbox It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading. There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc. The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive. The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files. The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt. Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards... You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents. Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself cannot be documented. There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely. In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file. File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small. Slow. Not paid people. Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test. The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only. In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive). It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.*** Skydrive The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged. The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference. It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever. If you loved this short article and you would certainly like to receive more information pertaining to 드라마 다시보기 kindly see our web site.